portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article portland metro

bikes/transportation

Wuss Ride 4ever

The monthly Portland Critical Mass ride has split into two separate rides - the "regular" Critical Mass and the Wuss/Courteous Mass. Here's an explanation on the Wuss Ride and its motivation to clear up some apparently common misperceptions that have been posted on Indymedia.
I recently read an Indymedia post with comments that claimed that the Wuss Ride "only had 10-12 riders" and that we "dangerously split up the Mass by stopping at every light" and other misperceptions that I'd like to clear up. To start with, the Wuss/Courteous Mass ride meets at NW Park and Couch at the same time as the regular Mass, at 5:30 pm on the last Friday of every month. The last Wuss ride had about 120 people on it, up from 50 the month before; it will probably continue to grow.

I've ridden on the Wuss/Courteous Mass for the past few months since it's reintroduction and am posting my own observations about its purpose and necessity. I'm not an official "representative" of the Wuss Mass, just a regular participant. The split with the regular CM is probably going to be permanent, because there are groups which have vastly different perspectives on what CM is all about. There is no one "right" answer. A large section of the regular Mass views it as a protest and opportunity to aggressively assert their right to be on the street. Most of the people on the Wuss Mass view the event as a celebration of bicycling and want to show drivers/pedestrians/mass transit users that biking is a helluva lot of fun.

The basic "rules" that Wuss riders follow are:
1.) The front of the Mass does not ride through red lights.
2.) If the light changes, riders block off oncoming traffic with their bikes (it's called "corking") and the Mass rides through in order to keep the ride together.
3.) Participants do NOT ride into oncoming traffic.
4.) No pounding on cars or other unprovoked aggressive behavior.

Note that most of this is for the sake of personal safety, and it's not set in stone. This is simply what people who participate in the Wuss Mass have agreed on so far. Blasting through red lights can get you run over or cause an accident as drivers swerve to avoid you. Same with riding into oncoming traffic. A few months ago, a bicyclist rode the wrong way on the Fremont Bridge, crashed head-on into a car, and went through the windshield. The driver was killed instantly and last I heard the bicyclist was in critical condition. Not sure if he/she lived. I think that's a horrible and unnecessary way to die.

Another big reason for the split is the question of empowerment. When you have a large group of people acting in unison, such as a Critical Mass ride, there's a strong feeling of solidarity. There's a sense that you can push the envelope because there are hundreds of people around to back you up. In many cases, that form of empowerment can be liberating and productive. In the case of the regular Critical Mass rides, a lot of people have observed that it can be rather dangerous and counter-productive, by encouraging unnecessary recklessness and stupidity.

Here are a couple of cases in point: On the July ride, the regular Mass caught up to the Wuss Ride and absorbed us. As we rode over the Morrison Bridge, I noticed a pair of intellectually-challenged young ladies riding in the oncoming traffic lanes. I pointed out to them that these drivers had probably never seen bicyclists on that bridge before, certainly weren't expecting to see them this evening, and were also driving into downtown with the sun right in their eyes. They were sun-blind and could barely see a damned thing as they sped over the bridge. The girls gave me the standard aggro-kid response: "Go fuck yourself." Later, these two decided to cork off traffic on Hawthorne Blvd at SE 7th. The rest of the Mass was slowly creeping along two blocks behind us, nowhere near close enough to necessitate corking. Several other people and I pointed this out to them and asked them to simply let the cars through until the Mass caught up to us. Again they told us to fuck ourselves, but finally relented when the Mass paused for an impromptu dance party at 7th and Madison.

Their behavior (and numerous other examples like it) are not the kind of behavior that I want to empower. If people choose to ride into oncoming traffic and act aggressively toward drivers, then that's certainly their choice. I don't believe that I have the right to tell them otherwise or attempt to restrict their behavior. But I do have the right to withdraw my support as part of the crowd that allows them to get high off of the sense of empowerment. By the same token, I wouldn't empower people whose idea of protest is smacking themselves on the head with a hammer. I think that's dumb, pointless, and likely to injure them, but if that's what they want to do, so be it. A number of Wuss Riders have similar thoughts. We can't tell people what to do and how to behave, but we can certainly choose to organize a separate ride where people don't indulge in that behavior. That's diversity of tactics.

It's also a lot more fun to be cop-free. We're out there to have fun because most of us have other outlets for protesting. We're not riding to intimidate or harass anyone, so the cops have left us alone so far, and will probably continue to do so. There are quite a few folks on the Wuss Mass who have been riding for years and years, and simply can't afford any more tickets or arrests. Same with people who have had other altercations with the law and have to worry about parole violations, etc. And there are those who are dead broke and simply can't afford the cost of a ticket or arrest. Wuss Mass gives them the option to ride in solidarity without fear of being nailed by the cops again. The people on the regular Critical Mass ride are free to act in whatever aggressive and reckless manner they choose, but they're also forced to deal with the fact that the police are going to spank them back into line intermittently. The methods the cops have used are horribly brutal, reckless, and inappropriate, but they feel empowered to act with that degree of force because of corresponding aggression from riders.

Besides, two big rides can be more fun than just one. Portland Critical Mass is now strong enough that we can sustain two independent rides, and those will both continue to grow. People aren't forced to put up with situations that they believe are intolerable - either too much restraint or not enough. For example, I was so sick of dealing with the aggro-kids that I stopped riding for a few months, until the Wuss Ride began.

If you're in the mood for a fun and celebratory ride, join the Wuss Ride. If you refuse to respect any guidelines and want to aggressively promote your right to the road, then join the regular Mass. I enjoy rolling down NW 21st or 23rd and watching people's reactions, knowing that the Wuss Ride is a prelude to the bigger ride that will be coming through shortly. We have options now. Please don't condemn those options or attempt to restrict anyone's right to ride in the manner that they choose.
Morrison not Freemont 21.Sep.2002 20:18

alex

It was the Morrison Bridge not Freemont on which cyclist rode into traffic. But Freemont is a good idea, hmmm.

Fremont not Morrison 21.Sep.2002 20:43

diversity

What? The accident that I mentioned occurred on the Fremont Bridge, according to an on-line Oregonian article. At least, that's what I remember. It was posted several months ago. I'm almost positive that it was Fremont.

What the hell are you thinking! 21.Sep.2002 21:01

AnarchoBikePunk

the wuss mass is opposed to everything critical mass stands for! we have to take back the streets, and not ask permission. If your not with the THE critical mass, then your against it. This doesnt have shit to do with having fun, were supposed to fuck up shit. Cop, cars, wusses there all the same to me; agents of repression.

If you wusses don't stop this unreasonable promotion of your own "ideas". im gonna get real upset.

FascistBikePunk 21.Sep.2002 21:22

hmm...

aw, you go ahead and get real upset.

let's see, uncompromising attitude, unreasonable demands, threats...why, you're a FASCIST! a real anarchist would understand that you're acting as an "agent of repression" yourself. you don't rule CM - everyone's allowed to have their own definition of what it stands for. why don't you play two-bit dictator somewhere else?

shut up and ride 21.Sep.2002 21:41

BikeDaddy

Critical Mass was a powerful force when most of these "aggro-kids" were still shittin' yellow and will still be going, stronger than ever, when most of them have moved on to accounting jobs. I don't care if there are two rides or ten, if you can get a pack of 20+ bikes together you'll get noticed. The wuss folks seem to have a good thing going , so let 'em. I'll wave when we cross paths.

I will never ride wuss, but I agree with DOT 21.Sep.2002 22:05

biker chick

I will always ride with the regular CM, but I have to second most of Diversity of Tactics' points. The July ride that DOT talks about was a little nutty in my opinion. Riding the wrong way down one way streets is stupid, and generally being agressive first makes no sense. However, I think self-defense in the face of vehicular assault is justified.

I think the need for the wuss ride would go away if we all discouraged each other from being unnecessarily aggressive.

I suggest:

-no riding the wrong way down one way streets
-no yelling at folks or pounding on their cars as long as they are not trying to push through the ride

Agins, these are suggestions, not rules to be laid down or enforced by CM peace police.

Whatever happens, I will continue to ride the main ride, but don't want to see us split even further--especially for the next two rides, which will be bigger, and more likely to be aggressively monitored by Portland's finest.

"AnarchoBikePunk", yeah right 21.Sep.2002 23:04

uh, huh

The message from "AnarchoBikePunk" is so obviously written by someone who has no idea what is going on that it is ridiculous. I would even say it is a plant by someone who wants to create dissension among the bikers of the city and disrupt the real dialogue that exists in Portland because of IMC and other means, such as talking and establishing common ground with your friends, neighbors, co-workers, and strangers.

Wuss Mass is very reasonable for many people who would (and will) think that all Critical Mass riders agree with the so-called "AnarchoBikePunk".

He wrote: "This doesn't have shit to do with having fun, were supposed to fuck up shit."

That's a huge crock! Critical Mass is ALL about having fun! It has nothing to do with violence, except when the Portland Police decide to add that element to the mix, as they are clearly very happy to do.

Open your eyes. Is it not clear that VIOLENCE is the REASON we are where we are in the world today?

If "AnarchoBikePunk" truly exists, I would suggest he/she actually study the principles of anarchy. Either that or find another moniker for your political views.

2 rides bad 1 ride good 22.Sep.2002 01:14

4 wheels bad 2 wheels good

All the "rules" for the wuss ride seem reasonable to me. They also seem like the original way critical mass is supossed to play out. One thing though, last month the cops explictly told us that they would crack down on corking and they did. So, all you wusses don't think you'll be safe!
One big ride will marginalize the few individuals who give CM a bad name, will meet the objectives of CM easier and will provide safety in numbers. 2 rides seems to defeat the point of CM

What? 22.Sep.2002 01:41

Silly People

AnarchoBikePunk is a plant...but we have a firsthand account of actual CM riders telling other CM riders to "go fuck yourself"? Sounds like ABP fits right in to me.

CM - thoughts 22.Sep.2002 13:22

Biker

Corking is necessary! Pushing the envelope is necessary! Treating car drivers like crap is not. I saw a person in a car wave, and she was yelled at during the last mass and called a foul name. That is just rude, immature and does not help change the world, is not radical, nor revolutionary.

It is necessary to draw a line between radical action and plain old stupidity. I want nothing to do with that behavior, and since it appears that regular riders are condoning that here on the site, I'll likely be with the wuss ride.

I might join the Courteous Mass 22.Sep.2002 18:53

A citizen

Excellent article!

I recently moved (back) to Oregon after several years in Bloomington, Indiana. I rode a couple of times with the Critical Mass there, but I stopped when I tired of their tactics: deliberately slowing down to obstruct traffic, hurling abuse at drivers, and chanting things like, "We'll blow up your SUV!" These people were actually offended to see police on bikes -- they thought this was somehow against the spirit of biking.

In my humble opinion, the point of these rides is to get more people out of cars and onto bikes. We can do this by showing them that we're having fun and that we're the sort of friendly people out with whom they'd like to hang. We're not going to force the cars off the road (at least for any significant amount of time) and we're not going to convert anyone by pounding on their car and screaming, "Fuck you!"

If I can figure out how to get my bike downtown (do the bus bike racks fill up for these things?), I might join, now that I know there's a Courteous Mass.

To: A citizen 22.Sep.2002 20:47

alex

With regard to transporting your bike downtown, try riding it. I'm not being sarcastic, but it always tickles me to see all the SUVs with bike racks at the BridgePedal or Forest Park trailhead. These things are transportation, the fact that bikes are fun enough to be recreation too doesn't detract from their utilitarian value.
If you live outside the city, like in Beaverton or Gresham, and consider a ride to downtown for CM too far, try setting up a Critical Mass out there. It might be tough, but I'd love to see it happen.

old and sad 23.Sep.2002 02:00

dragKING

POUND AWAY, sure it can alienate, but it is a sane reaction to an insane situation, and that dear readers is because all you decadent drivers are santioning a fucking warWARWARWARWARWAR- All the dead all the suffering and all for u.s. imperialism to which most of us are just pawns that are used then shit out!!! You are sedated and destroyed with technology, decadence, and capitalism. I feel so sad for all of us that I will and we must risk arrest after arrest and even death to help us survive AMERIKA. So I disagree with your wuss SPLITTERS-it's classic. Please no... lets work on unarresting our brothers and use our people power while we still have it. Now is the time!!! And wake up fine people don't legitimize any part of these institutions of global greed and terror, like the police beating and spraying. Be strong friends

to dragKING 23.Sep.2002 08:51

A citizen

Yes, of course the situation is insane and catastrophic. The only way the Earth can be saved is to get everyone (or at least most people) to live sustainable lifestyles.

Trouble is, people can only change so fast; they can only hear the messages that they're ready for. Short of a nervous breakdown, an investment banker is not going to suddenly sell all of his worldly possessions, go vegan, and move into a yurt. First we have to convince him to recycle his Wall Street Journal, go a little lighter on the steaks, and watch a little less corporate TV. Then maybe we can get him to ride the bus once a week or get a hybrid car. After he's had some time to simplify his life, maybe he'll realize that he doesn't need $600K a year and get a more positive job.

If the message is, "Can you do this one little thing to help?" people might listen. If the message is, "YOU ARE EVIL!" people will close their ears. This is (more or less) a democracy, and we need to get a majority of the people on our side.

Torn 23.Sep.2002 10:57

Critical Wuss

I'm not sure which ride I will attend. I have been riding with CM, fairly consistently, for the last couple of years. Many of the concerns of some of the more extreme riders are valid, in my opinion. I think the resource degradation issue needs to be addressed, and SOON. The thing is, there are countless other venues for propogating their ideas. Pissing off armed soldiers, while hiding in a group that is staging a celebration of bicycling, doesn't seem very brave to me, A.B.P..

Why don't the tough guys with the half-baked gameplan form their own ride? Wreck whatever you like, as long as YOU are prepared to accept the consequences. I think DOT is crucial, but y'all don't have the right to ram your ideas down everyone else's throats.

I think I will attend C.M. once again (with my camera). I don't want the police to get the idea that their own A.B.P. tactics are crushing the spirit of the ride.

Thank you! 27.Sep.2002 05:36

Skwirl

I've been admiring the ideals of Critical Mass for several years (since I went to college in Bloomington, actually), but the idea of going out there for the first time and not knowing what to expect is very daunting.

Seriously, the whole point of most protest is to overwhelm the police with pure numbers. Guess what? There are a lot of so-called "wusses" in the world, especially if you define "wuss" as somebody who doesn't want to get hit by a car or brutally arrested. If you're going to win the war against automobile culture, then you're going to have to enlist as many wusses as possible. Who knows? Maybe someone like me who wants to get their feet wet in the Courteous Mass will switch over to the other camp eventually anyways.

Count me in.