Today in court the caseworker said I needed to have continued supervised visits because of my petition against cps and their lack of careful consideration when placing the children with their dad over me.
My lawyer pointed out that this was a violation of my constitutional rights. (Of course the judge stated I wasn't wise to petition against an agency that has wardships of my children)
I was informed that I was jeopardizing my children's safety for this petition (mind you the children's names and the fathers names are not on the petition. They claimed I'd put pictures of my children on the internet (not my children, but my child's upper arm) and that this again also jeoparlizes my children's safety.......
And I quote. " dhs has concern that the mother has inapprepriately published information about the child welfare case on social media sites. Some of this information was a direct attack on (children's father) And include photographs of the children. This obviously raises concern about her judgement about the needs of the children for safety and for a positive relationship with both of their parents."
It also goes on to say "dhs shall allow mother to have unsupervised visits after a safety plan has been developed that addresses the appropriate way for either parent to raise concerns about health and safety of the children and inclusion of information and photographs of the children on social media sites."
So I am to keep having supervised visits untill they get around to telling me not to put my children's pictures and names on social media sites. (Which I haven't done)
This is what justice looks like in our courts today..... It should rightly be named injustice and oppression of We the people and against our constitutional rights.