portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article commentary global

election fraud | government

Vote Like Your Life Depends On It. It Did (Once)

We have the old single-selection two-party. So no choice at all for you.
The "republic" is simply ruled by judges who may, for example, throw gays a bone for show now and then, but really only watch out for the rights of the people who matter -- the rich, of course.

Democracy means knowingness and good will of the PEOPLE. Not the republicist rapaciousness of the judges.

Teach the people! Trust The People! We are not the"mob"! The rich Great Gamers are the real mob. You have to know the truth and seek the truth and the truth will set you free.

There are two entirely different kinds of elections, and kinds of "contestants". An election of the president of a science fiction novel forum is not at all the same thing as an election of a United States President. The former is really a contest between two (or more) individual candidates (and their agendas), but the latter is actually a contest between the weak and the mighty the well-supported candidates of a very few elites versus the grass-roots candidates of the vast multitude of non-elite people.

Simple score voting can be completely described in one short simple sentence: Give no vote at all, or from one to ten votes to any number of candidates you wish (up to some reasonable limit, say 20 candidates), and then simply add all the votes up.

It can be completely machine-free! If machines make tallying X time easier, they make coordinated rigging X times easier. Which can we truly afford???

One could say that simple score eliminates 90% of the spoiler effect. To illustrate: if a voter gives 10 votes to Nader and 9 votes to Gore, it is simply obvious that, if Nader does not win, the voter has only sacrificed exactly 10% of their voting power. Not 100% as they would have had they been forced to use the usual single-selection ("faux plurality") voting method.

No fancy math is necessary to compare and contrast it to every other option for effectiveness and simplicity, including single-selection (aka "plurality," our present "system") Condorcet, Borda, IRV, Range (with its tricky "averages"), Approval (which is not adequately discriminative), etc.

The simple score method I advocate is the very simplest, since it only allows from 1 to 10 votes to be given, not from 0 to 9, or 0 to 10. That is simply another complication. It also has no vote-averaging that seriously complicates the "range" score method. I also seem t be the only one to point out that voters should always vote artfully (aka strategically), not artlessly or heroically (aka "honestly" or "sincerely").

(Simple score is not like approval voting at all -- it is vastly more discriminative.)

PLEASE NOTE: score voting has never been used when there were truly high stakes for the voters. The single-selection method has always been utilized to spoiler effect enforced two-party or two-candidate choices. And would three money-empowered choices be better? Did Greece and Spain with their parliamentary schemes fare well with their "systems"?

And the people MUST vote strategically -- NOT artlessly ("honestly", "sincerely")! Do the Senators and judges act with honesty and sincerity? Do they vote heroicaly? Take a wild guess!

And why do you suppose they don't have just ONE money-empowered candidate or party? Something to think about?


But first we need parallel, publically observed vote counts... 13.Aug.2015 13:44

just me

But before simple-score voting can even be implemented...

Volunteer for the WE COUNT Corps to Restore Electorial Democracy

To implement good processes like simple-score voting, we've first got to neutralize the pernicious effects of all election machines, as you've suggested. Given our current circumstances, one way to start in that direction would be to have volunteers conduct parallel, publically observed vote counts that are open to all interested parties, as the Election Defense Alliance (EDA) is now in the process of arranging (check out the link above; page contents reproduced below).

Had Enough of "Faith-Based" Election Results Entrusted To A Corporate Machine?

Volunteer for the WE COUNT Corps to Restore Electoral Democracy

As long as computers count our votes, there is NO WAY to know that the outcomes the machines spit out are true and accurate unless we also hand-count the ballots.

Why not just hand-count the ballots to begin with!


  • All volunteers will be vetted (as citizens are for Jury Duty).

  • Training will be provided.

  • All counting will be done in teams of at least two people from opposing parties.

  • Representatives from all the parties on the ballot will be allowed to observe each team.

Democracy must never be outsourced to private interests, nor elections conducted on a basis of blind faith. Our votes must be counted on Election Night at the polling sites in public view before ballots are removed from the public sight.

Election officials will tell us they cannot get enough people to hand-count ballots.

SIGN UP BELOW for the WE COUNT Corps and show election officials that there ARE enough willing citizens to count the votes by hand on Election Night. They cannot use a lack of people-power as an excuse. Let us restore transparency to elections in America.

Thank you for volunteering to uphold our democracy.

Volunteer for the WE COUNT Corps to Restore Electoral Democracy

Electon Defense Alliance
Electon Defense Alliance