portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article reposts global

9.11 investigation | police / legal

New President: Get Ready For Terrorism

Governments have terrorized their own people many times in history. They do so in order to rally support around policies that the public would not otherwise support like increased militarization and restrictions on civil liberties. In the United States, government-sponsored terrorism is maximized during the year a new president takes office. These facts, along with the historically low approval ratings for President Trump, suggest that the U.S. should be prepared for a major terrorist event in the near future.

In the last 24 years, every new U.S. presidency has been accompanied by increased acts of government-sponsored terrorism in its first year. It began with the 1993 WTC bombing only a month after the inauguration of Bill Clinton. As the New York Times reported at the time, it was clear that the FBI was involved in the WTC plot. According to an FBI informer, agents knew the bombing would happen and helped to prepare the explosives.

Last year, suspicions about FBI cover-up of the 9/11 attacks continued. At the same time, new acts of domestic terrorism displayed the same indications of FBI involvement have been common since 1993.
 http://digwithin.net/2017/02/06/new-president-terrorism/

New President: Get Ready for Terrorism

Posted on February 6, 2017 by Kevin Ryan

Governments have terrorized their own people many times in history. They do so in order to rally support around policies that the public would not otherwise support like increased militarization and restrictions on civil liberties. In the United States, government-sponsored terrorism is maximized during the year a new president takes office. These facts, along with the historically low approval ratings for President Trump, suggest that the U.S. should be prepared for a major terrorist event in the near future.

In the last 24 years, every new U.S. presidency has been accompanied by increased acts of government-sponsored terrorism in its first year. It began with the 1993 WTC bombing only a month after the inauguration of Bill Clinton. As the New York Times reported at the time, it was clear that the FBI was involved in the WTC plot. According to an FBI informer, agents knew the bombing would happen and helped to prepare the explosives.

CBS News also reported that the informer had recorded many of his conversations with the Bureau and that those tapes were very incriminating. Apparently the tapes, which were never revealed to the public, went into significant detail about the FBI's coordination of the bomb building.

In the years leading up to 9/11, the FBI's support for terrorism continued. The Bureau failed miserably at preventing terrorism when preventing terrorism was its primary goal. Moreover, the actions of FBI leadership suggest that it was facilitating and covering-up acts of terrorism. When 9/11 happened, some agents accused their own agency of being responsible.

It is widely recognized that the crimes of 9/11 rescued George W. Bush from rapidly declining public and media support in his first year as president. After the attacks, his approval ratings rose 35% and his administration was able to implement many pre-planned policies that the public would otherwise have never supported including the Patriot Act and several wars. Evidence that Bush Administration members were involved in the attacks and the subsequent cover-up has become compelling.

In 2009, the first year of the Obama presidency, TIME reported that domestic terrorism hit a peak. Although the government claimed to have foiled many of the alleged terrorist plots that year, news coverage of the events kept terrorism in the forefront of the public mindset.

By 2011, even mainstream media sources were catching on. Journalist Glenn Greenwald reported in Salon that the cases in which the FBI had supposedly stopped terrorist plots were actually instances of the FBI plotting terrorist acts and entrapping the young, naive suspects.

In the past few years acts of domestic terrorism in Western countries have exhibited a formulaic set of features. The pattern observed suggests that most or all of the incidents were false flag events. Meanwhile, the FBI and CIA were found to be engaging in contemptible abuses of American justice during the military trial of alleged 9/11 conspirators. Those abuses indicated that U.S. intelligence agencies have a vested interest in covering-up the truth about 9/11.

Last year, suspicions about FBI cover-up of the 9/11 attacks continued. At the same time, new acts of domestic terrorism displayed the same indications of FBI involvement have been common since 1993.

As knowledge of the past grows, it is possible that citizens will prepare for opportunities to expose government-sponsored terrorism. For example, almost everyone has a cell phone with a video camera that connects directly to the internet. Once a terrorist event is first reported, it is feasible for those in the vicinity of the crime to document what is happening in order to better refute what is likely to become an obviously false official account. Citizen reporters could talk to eyewitnesses and photograph suspects and physical evidence, helping to reveal the deception.

With President Trump spiraling downward in public opinion polls, it seems that the only way to recover public support for his new government is through a major act of terrorism. Although this is a frightening prospect, and one that is predicted by the last 24 years of U.S. history, the next major terrorist attack could be the one that results in revelations that cannot be ignored. Whether this year or another, the public will eventually realize that willful ignorance of terrorism drives many of society's biggest problems.


___________



See Also

Terrorism And Terror Propaganda In 2016
 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2017/01/434030.shtml

Nine Reasons Why It Doesn't Matter Who Is President
 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2016/07/432869.shtml

Terrorism And G4S: Was Orlando Another False Flag?
 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2016/06/432547.shtml

How To Spy The 9/11 Lie
 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2015/10/430687.shtml

Trillion-Dollar Security State: Is America Any Safer 15 Years After 9/11?
 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2016/08/432943.shtml

A Closer Look At 9/11 Legend Rudy Giuliani
 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2016/12/433908.shtml

homepage: homepage: http://digwithin.net/2017/02/06/new-president-terrorism/
address: address: Dig Within


As A Social Justice Activist, I Have No Bromance With Trump 17.Feb.2017 08:30

blues

However, if Hillary had won, I am inclined to think we would be experiencing a nuclear holocaust now. (We do not have simple score voting and therefore two-party hegemony is still the problem.) And I certainly do not think that the deep state media, which despises Trump, can be trusted to conduct honest polls. (About 50% of the population voted for Trump on November 8, 2016, And I doubt Trump's approval has changed in the three months since.) Remember, virtually all of the deep state media (DSM) has been working fiendishly to de-legitimize this administration.

They keep harping on the supposed perfidy of Russia and Putin endlessly, and insist that Trump and his staff are somehow "in bed" with them. Which is completely absurd. Take a look at this:
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7j_ZfKmcnSk&feature=youtu.be

{Quote} In the last 24 years, every new U.S. presidency has been accompanied by increased acts of government-sponsored terrorism in its first year. {End quote} I have not noticed this. Are we expected to worry about it? If anything, Donald Trump is less likely to start new wars than his predecessors. He is effectively an isolationist, and I heartily agree with that particular aspect of his policies. And yes, we need tariffs, which would protect what little of the productional system we have not yet outsourced. Some of his other policies, not so much. He is disturbingly authoritarian. But with two-party hegemony you take what you can get.

The Big Difference is... 17.Feb.2017 08:36

Bubble Boy

...the mainstream media was totally complicit in creating and maintaining the 9-11 lie. It seems more likely that the Deep State will now use them to convince the public that Trump is responsible for the next act of terror even if he has nothing to do with it.

What Terror Will The CIA Perpetrate To Back-Channel Against Trump? 17.Feb.2017 13:37

blues

How many of us must be sacrificed to keep the Agency money flowing?